Â鶹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Â鶹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications
Join The Â鶹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

2022 Annual Meeting | Peer Review of Scientific Articles—Tips on How to Respond to the Dreaded Reviewer #2

Sunday 04/03/22
04:30 PM - 05:00 PM PDT Add To Calendar
This program will be presented both in-person and online
This program is not expected to be available in the meeting's On Demand product.
Learner Engagement Center (Research Connections)
Brian Berman, MD, MS, FÂ鶹´«Ã½Ó³»­
Â鶹´«Ã½Ó³»­, Research, and Methodology
We’ve all encountered Reviewer #2. The one who is harsh, hostile and unhelpful. The reviewer who most stands between you getting your scientific article published. During this presentation we will discuss some important principles to consider when responding to scientific peer reviews in order to enhance the likelihood your article will be published.
No CME available
Interpersonal and Communication Skills, Professionalism
Introductory
Brain Health
Fellow, Resident, General Neurologist, Specialist Neurologist, Non-neurologist, Advanced Practice Provider, Neurohospitalist, Medical Student
Didactic, Audience Participation

Program Materials Program Evaluations

Event Timeline
03:00 PM - 03:45 PM PDT Speaker Peer Review of Scientific Articles – Tips on How to Respond to the Dreaded Reviewer #2
Brian Berman, MD, MS, FÂ鶹´«Ã½Ó³»­
Faculty Disclosures
Brian Berman, MD, MS, FÂ鶹´«Ã½Ó³»­ The institution of Dr. Berman has received research support from Dystonia Medical Research Foundation. The institution of Dr. Berman has received research support from National Institutes of Health. The institution of Dr. Berman has received research support from Neurocrine Biosciences. The institution of Dr. Berman has received research support from Benign Essential Blepharospasm Research Foundation. The institution of Dr. Berman has received research support from National Institutes of Health.