Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Motor Responses to Apomorphine Sublingual Film Compared With Levodopa in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease and “OFF” Episodes
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders Posters (7:00 AM-5:00 PM)
135

To compare motor improvement after apomorphine sublingual film (APL) versus levodopa administration in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and “OFF” episodes.

APL is approved for the on-demand treatment of “OFF” episodes associated with PD in the United States and Canada. Analysis of pivotal study (NCT02469090) data indicated earlier onset of motor improvement and peak response with APL vs levodopa in patients with PD and “OFF” episodes. Analysis with expanded data from a long-term safety study (NCT02542696) was performed.
Patients with PD and “OFF” episodes taking stable PD medications were enrolled in the pivotal or long-term studies. APL titration occurred during sequential office visits when patients were “OFF” to determine the dose (10–35 mg; 5-mg increments) resulting in a tolerable FULL “ON” within 45 minutes. Motor responses after open-label APL and usual-dose levodopa administration were compared using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III score, assessed predose and 15, 30, and 60 minutes postdose. The percentage of responders (≥30% reduction in Part III score vs predose) was also assessed.
Overall, 384 patients received APL and levodopa. Predose mean MDS-UPDRS Part III scores were comparable (APL, 41.9; levodopa, 42.2). Mean motor response with APL vs levodopa, respectively, was approximately 2-fold higher at 15 minutes postdose (–13.9 vs –6.7) and remained higher at 30 minutes (–22.9 vs –16.3); the levodopa peak response occurred at 60 minutes (–24.3 vs –24.4). More patients were responders to APL vs levodopa, respectively, at 15 (52% vs 21%) and 30 minutes (88% vs 65%); responder rates were similar at 60 minutes (88% vs 92%).
Consistent with previous findings, apomorphine sublingual film was associated with greater motor improvement and more responders at earlier time points versus levodopa, further supporting its use in patients with a delayed “ON” response to levodopa.
Authors/Disclosures
Jennifer S. Hui, MD (University of Southern California)
PRESENTER
Dr. Hui has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sunovion. Dr. Hui has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sunovion. The institution of Dr. Hui has received research support from Roche. The institution of Dr. Hui has received research support from Abbvie. Dr. Hui has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Roundtable speaker with Medscape .
Susan Fox, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Toronto Western Hospital) The institution of Dr. Fox has received research support from MJFF/Safra. The institution of Dr. Fox has received research support from Parkinson Canada. The institution of Dr. Fox has received research support from NIH. Dr. Fox has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Eric Pappert Eric Pappert has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc..
No disclosure on file