Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

“Cortical” deficits at presentation do not influence treatment times among acute ischemic stroke patients.
Cerebrovascular Disease and Interventional Neurology
P9 - Poster Session 9 (12:00 PM-1:00 PM)
4-018
To determine the impact of cortical deficits at presentation on door-to-needle time in acute ischemic stroke patient.

Door-to-needle time (DTN) is associated with outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, who are eligible to receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA). Various factors have been shown to impact DTN time including patient-related factors such as management of hypertension on admission; hospital-related factors such as time-to-imaging; and system-related factors, all potentially affecting clinical outcomes. 

 


This was a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data through Get-with-the-Guidelines from Jan-2015 to Dec-2018 at our comprehensive stroke center. Patient demographics, medical history including vascular risk factors, last known well time, arrival time, door-to-CT time, treatment time, admission National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), pre-stroke modified Rankin scale (mRS) were analyzed. We analyzed two groups based on presence or absence of major hemispheric cortical sign(s) (aphasia and/or hemineglect) at presentation. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.  


Of 280 patients (mean age 72; 51% men) who received IV tPA in the emergency department (ED), 49.6% presented with at least one cortical sign. Patients in this group were older (79 vs 69 years, p<0.0001) and were more frequently women (57%, p=0.003). These patients had a higher NIHSS (11 vs. 3, p<0.0001), which is expected as an inherent imperfection of the scale. Median DTN time (45 vs. 43 minutes, p=0.92), Onset-to-treatment (OTT) times (145 vs. 150 minutes, p=0.51), and proportion of patients treated within 45 minutes (p=0.41) or 60 minutes (p=0.41) did not differ between the groups.

 


In our AIS patient population, major hemispheric cortical sign(s) at presentation did not impact DTN times. Nonetheless, cortical deficits are just one example of “non-traditional” factors  which can potentially impact DTN times and subsequent clinical outcomes.  

 


Authors/Disclosures
Sneh Preet Munder, MD (Northwell health)
PRESENTER
Dr. Munder has nothing to disclose.
Anand V. Patel, MD (University of Texas Medical Branch) Dr. Patel has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Jeffrey M. Katz, MD (North Shore University Hospital) Dr. Katz has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Katz Medical Consulting. The institution of Dr. Katz has received research support from Medtronic.
Richard Libman, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Northwell Health) Dr. Libman has nothing to disclose.