Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Concordance among neuropsychological profile, functional neuroimaging and pathological biomarkers in Primary Progressive Aphasia. A single-centre experience
Aging, Dementia, and Behavioral Neurology
P9 - Poster Session 9 (12:00 PM-1:00 PM)
10-009

To assess concordance among neuropsychological assessment (NPS), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET), CSF and Amyloid-PET (Amy-PET) in Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA).

Current classification identifies three PPA variants: Progressive Non-Fluent Aphasia (nfvPPA), Semantic Dementia (svAPP) and Logopenic Aphasia (lvPPA). nfvPPA and svPPA are considered variants of Frontotemporal Dementia whereas lvPPA is considered as an atypical presentation of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Neverthless, there is no absolute association between each PPA variant and a single pathological entity. Moreover, 10–41% of patients do not fullfil criteria for any PPA variant or show overlapping features (unclassifiable/mixed PPA [u/mPPA]). 

We included 60 subjects with diagnosis of PPA. All patients underwent NPS, FDG-PET scan and Amy-PET scan or CSF biomarkers measurement. Our sample included 10 nfvPPA, 17 svPPA, 22 lvPPA and 11 u/mPPA. Subjects were defined as Aβ+ if they had at least one positive AD biomarker.

10% of nfvPPA, 24% of svPPA and 96% of lvPPA were Aβ+. Concordance between Aβ1-42 and Amy-PET was 68%, but significantly improved when considering Aβ1-42/40 ratio (78.94%). Concordance between clinico-funtional diagnosis and AD biomarkers was 84%. We analyzed discordant cases and found that among four nfvPPA/svPPA subjects with positive Amy-PET, two subjects did not perform CSF analysis and one svPPA subject had positive Amy-PET but negative CSF biomarkers. In one svPPA subject, AD patholgy was confirmed both by Amy-PET and CSF. One lvPPA subject had normal CSF Aβ1-42 concentration, but Aβ1-42/40 and Amy-PET were not performed. 55% of u/mPPA were Aβ+. In this group, two uPPA had no AD pathology, 100% of nfv/lvPPA and 40% of sv/lvPPA were Aβ+.

svPPA and u/mPPA showed heterogeneous pathological features, while nfvPPA and lvPPA had more homogeneous findings. Aβ1-42/40 improved accuracy of CSF biomarkers and concordance between CSF and Amy-PET. In discordant cases, combination of CSF and Amy-PET could confirm an underlying AD pathology.
Authors/Disclosures
Salvatore Mazzeo (Policlinico San Donato S.p.A.)
PRESENTER
Mr. Mazzeo has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Benedetta Nacmias Benedetta Nacmias has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Elsevier.
Sandro Sorbi Sandro Sorbi has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file