Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Bright White Light Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Associated Fatigue: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Multiple Sclerosis
P8 - Poster Session 8 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
9-002
To perform a double-blinded phase II study of the tolerability and feasibility of controlled bright white light therapy (LT) in MS-associated fatigue.

Bright white LT has been shown to reduce fatigue in other neurological disorders.

Adults 18-70 years old with MS fatigue were randomized 1:1 to 10,000 lux bright white light (BWL, active) or <300 lux dim red light (DRL, control).

Participants enrolled for 10 weeks in a 2-week baseline of sleep/fatigue tracking; a 4-week intervention of twice daily 1-hour LT; and a 4-week washout without LT. An EDSS and MS Quality of Life-54 (MSQOL-54) inventory were recorded.

Primary outcome measures were the feasibility of LT and occurrence of adverse events (AEs).  Change in FSS and MSQOL-54 from baseline to the end of LT were analyzed.


141 patients were screened. 41 enrolled. 6 patients voluntarily withdrew before study procedures. 4 withdrew during LT.

There were 35 participants (28 female;mean age 44.9;median EDSS 3.0) in the intention to treat analysis with a mean baseline FSS of 52.7 (range 37-63). 20 participants received BWL and 15 DRL.

There were 15 AEs with BWL (headache 8; difficulty sleeping 3; dizziness 1; difficulty seeing at night 1; fatigue 1; hot flush 1) compared to 3 with DRL (headache 1; eye strain 1; tearing issues 1). 4 AEs were related to prior conditions.

The post-LT mean FSS did not differ between BWL and DRL (mean 45.8 vs. 46.7 points). The mean change in FSS from baseline was -6.5 for BWL vs. -6.7 for DRL (p=0.95).

The mean change in MSQOL-54 from baseline was 7.1 for BWL vs. 4.7 for DRL (p=0.57).

 

LT in MS patients is feasible. LT had a favorable impact on fatigue and quality of life with both BWL and DRL. A larger RCT would determine if different spectra of light are relevant. 
Authors/Disclosures
Farrah J. Mateen, MD, PhD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Northwestern University Department of Neurology)
PRESENTER
Dr. Mateen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Amgen. Dr. Mateen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Genentech. Dr. Mateen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. The institution of Dr. Mateen has received research support from Genentech. The institution of Dr. Mateen has received research support from Amgen. The institution of Dr. Mateen has received research support from TG Therapeutics. Dr. Mateen has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.
Andre Vogel (Massachusetts General Hospital) No disclosure on file
Tamara B. Kaplan, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Brigham and Women'S Hospital) Dr. Kaplan has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD Serono . Dr. Kaplan has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genentech. Dr. Kaplan has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen.
Gladia C. Hotan (Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT) Ms. Hotan has received research support from Institute of High Performance Computing.
Natalie C. Manalo, MD No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Kathryn Holroyd, MD The institution of Dr. Holroyd has received research support from NINDS.
No disclosure on file
Aleksandar Videnovic, MD, MSc, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (MGH Neurological Clinical Research Institute) Dr. Videnovic has nothing to disclose.