Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Effect of Ibudilast on Thalamus and Spinal Cord in Progressive MS: Analysis from a Phase II Trial
Multiple Sclerosis
P8 - Poster Session 8 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
9-017

To report the effect of ibudilast on thalamus and spinal cord in progressive MS.

The thalamus and spinal cord are CNS regions commonly affected in MS. The SPRINT-MS phase 2 trial, where ibudilast slowed brain atrophy progression by 48%, provides an ideal setting to evaluate the impact of ibudilast on measures of tissue integrity in these regions.

255 subjects with progressive MS received either ibudilast or placebo for two years and imaged every 24 weeks using Siemens or GE 3T systems. Acquisitions included 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo; proton density weighted and T2 weighted 2D turbo/fast spin-echo; 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo with and without magnetization transfer pulse. Upper cervical spinal cord area was determined by atlas-based segmentation; thalamic volume was measured using multi-modal atlas-based segmentation and Jacobian integration; mean MTR was calculated within the thalamic mask. All imaging endpoints were assessed for differing rates of change between the treatment groups over time using linear mixed modeling.

Change in thalamic MTR was -0.01 units/month with placebo and +0.005 with ibudilast (difference 0.0154; p<0.05). Change in thalamic volume was -0.0073 mL/month with placebo and -0.0072 with ibudilast (difference 0.0001; p=0.95). Upper cervical cord was analyzed from only 133 subjects. Change in spinal cord area was -0.0567 mm2/month with placebo and -0.298 with ibudilast (difference 0.0269; p=0.48).

In a phase II trial in progressive MS, ibudilast treatment had differential effects on the thalamus: thalamic MTR improved with ibudilast, but progression of thalamic atrophy was unaffected, which suggests that MTR and atrophy are measuring different aspects of MS. Similarly with whole brain atrophy, progression of spinal cord atrophy was cut in half, although this difference was not statistically significant. These analyses provide further insight into the effect of ibudilast in progressive MS and the utility of these imaging modalities.

Authors/Disclosures
Kunio Nakamura, PhD (Cleveland Clinic)
PRESENTER
Dr. Nakamura has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for INmune Bio. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from PCORI. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from NIH. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from NIH. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Dr. Nakamura has received research support from DOD. Dr. Nakamura has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Robert J. Fox, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Cleveland Clinic) Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for AB Science. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD Serono. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genentech. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Immunic. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for TG Therapeutics. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Siemens. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Astoria Biologica. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for InnoCare Pharma. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Immunic. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for AB Science. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for BMS. The institution of Dr. Fox has received research support from National Institutes of Health. The institution of Dr. Fox has received research support from National MS Society. Dr. Fox has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.