Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Effectiveness and Safety of Lemborexant Over 12 Months in Adults with Insomnia Disorder: Long-term Results From the Phase 3 SUNRISE-2 Study
Sleep
P2 - Poster Session 2 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
5-010

Assess long-term effectiveness/safety of lemborexant (LEM), a dual orexin receptor antagonist in development for insomnia disorder.

In SUNRISE-2 (NCT02952820; E2006-G000-303), LEM demonstrated significant benefit versus placebo on patient-reported (subjective) sleep onset and maintenance over 6 months (M6). Here we report long-term (12 months) LEM effectiveness and safety.

SUNRISE-2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (first 6 months [Period 1]), 12-month global phase 3 study in adults age ≥18y with insomnia disorder. Period 1: subjects randomized to placebo or LEM (5mg, [LEM5]; 10mg, [LEM10]). Period 2: placebo subjects rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10 (results not reported here); LEM subjects continued their assigned dose. Changes from baseline were assessed from sleep diary data. P-values at M6 were based on mixed-effect repeated measurement analysis evaluating least squares mean treatment differences for placebo versus LEM.

The Full Analysis Set comprised 949 subjects (Period 1: Placebo, n=318; LEM5, n=316; LEM10, n=315). At the end of Period 1/M6, 251 and 226 subjects continued LEM5 and LEM10, respectively. Median subjective sleep onset latency (min) was significantly reduced with LEM5 (−21.8) and LEM10 (−28.2) versus placebo (−11.4; both P<0.0001) at M6; reductions persisted at Month 12 (M12; LEM5, −25.7; LEM10, −32.9). Mean (SD) increases in subjective sleep efficiency (%) were significantly greater with LEM5 (15.3 [14.6]) and LEM10 (15.6 [15.6]) versus placebo (10.4 [13.8]; both P≤0.0001) at M6; increases persisted at M12 (LEM5, 15.8 [14.3]; LEM10, 17.6 [15.9]). Mean (SD) decreases in subjective wake after sleep onset (min) were significantly greater with LEM5 (−51.5 [67.3]) and LEM10 (−48.1 [68.6]) versus placebo (−32.1 [55.3], both P<0.05) at M6; decreases persisted at M12 (LEM5, −53.4 [61.5]; LEM10, −56.8 [70.6]). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate. No deaths occurred.

LEM was well tolerated and effective over 12 months, supporting LEM as a potential long-term treatment option for insomnia disorder.

Authors/Disclosures
Margaret Moline
PRESENTER
Margaret Moline has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of EISAI, INC.. Margaret Moline has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care. Margaret Moline has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a review, loan repayment program with NIH.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Carlos Perdomo (Eisai Inc.) No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file