Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

The Best Motion Sensor Localization For Ataxic Gait Assessment
Multiple Sclerosis
P16 - Poster Session 16 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
9-011

To distinguish ataxic from normal gait using data from full-body motion capture device. To compare accuracy of various machine learning classifiers. To find the most suitable sensor location for ataxia classification.

Gait ataxia is caused by various neurological diseases which affect cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord and significantly contributes to patients disability. Wireless motion tracking devices along with complex motion analysis has a big potential in early diagnostics and further patient monitoring. In case of walking various parametres such as stride time, step length, rhythm, joint angles and symmetry are used for pathological gait patterns recognition. Perception Neuron is a commercial wearable device containing 32 sensors each composed of gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer.

Group of 7 patients with gait ataxia in spinocerebellar type of multiple sclerosis and 7 healthy volunteers were recorded by “Perception Neuron“ while walking. Each recording was divided into several shorter (20s) parts counting 139 segments in total. Power spectral density of accelerometric data was classified by Support Vector Machine, Bayesian Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbours and Neural Networks. Accuraccy for different sensor locations were compared.

Best accuracy for different sensors locations was achieved on head, neck and shoulders (up to 99.6%). Accuracy of different classifiers in these locations were comparable with maximal difference 1.8%. The worst results were on feet (65-88%, depending on the classification method) and shanks (76-86%).

The evaluation of ataxic walking using motion sensors is a sensitive method, which depends on the location of the sensors. The best accuracy can be achieved by the sensors which are the most distant from the ground. The most likely explanation is the increase of the signal / noise ratio. Noise is comparable for all sensors, while the amplitude of compensatory oscillations increases with distance from the ground.

Authors/Disclosures
Ondrej Dostal
PRESENTER
The institution of Ondrej Dostal has received research support from Ministry of Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ Youths and Sports.
Ondrej Dostal The institution of Ondrej Dostal has received research support from Ministry of Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ Youths and Sports.
No disclosure on file
Oldrich Vysata No disclosure on file
Ladislav Pazdera, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Vestra Clinics S.r.o.) Dr. Pazdera has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Pazdera has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Teva.
Martin Valis, MD Dr. Valis has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Valis has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Dr. Valis has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Teva.