Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Perampanel Exposure–Response Relationships for Cognition and Safety in Pediatric Patients (Aged 4 to <12 years) with Epilepsy
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG)
P13 - Poster Session 13 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
12-007

To explore perampanel exposure–response relationships for cognition and safety in pediatric patients (aged 4 to <12 years) with partial-onset seizures (POS) or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses.

Perampanel is a once-daily oral anti-seizure medication for POS and PGTCS.

Data from POS and PGTCS subjects were pooled from an open-label, Phase III study of adjunctive perampanel oral suspension (NCT02849626). Graphical PK/PD analyses assessed potential relationships between: (1) model-predicted average perampanel concentration at steady state (Cav,ss) and cognitive endpoints (change from baseline in A-B Neuropsychological Assessment [ABNAS], Child Behavior Checklist [CBCL], and Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test [LGPT]); (2) perampanel Cav,ss  and the most frequent (occurring in ≥10 subjects) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); (3) model-predicted maximum perampanel concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and the most frequent TEAEs. If a relationship was apparent, PK/PD modeling using binary logistic regression was performed.

These analyses included 156 perampanel-treated subjects (POS, n=129; PGTCS, n=27). Graphical PK/PD analysis found no discernible relationship between perampanel Cav,ss and change from baseline for ABNAS (n=148), CBCL (aged ≤5 years, n=19; aged >5 years, n=115), or LGPT (dominant hand, n=117; non-dominant hand, n=113), thus PK/PD modeling was not performed. TEAEs occurring in ≥10 subjects included nasopharyngitis (n=23 [14.7%]), somnolence (n=21 [13.5%]), aggression/agitation/irritability (n=20 [12.8%]), pyrexia (n=14 [9.0%]), and influenza (n=10 [6.4%]). No relationship between perampanel Cav,ss and the most common TEAEs was observed. Graphical assessment showed possible relationships between model-predicted perampanel Cmax,ss and occurrence of somnolence, aggression/agitation/irritability, and pyrexia. However, PK/PD modeling found no statistically significant effect of perampanel on these TEAEs.

These assessments suggest there is no exposure–response relationship between perampanel and cognitive or safety outcomes in pediatric patients with POS or PGTCS, supporting the conclusion that cognitive function is not clinically impaired by perampanel administration.

Funding: Eisai Inc.

Authors/Disclosures

PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
Larisa Reyderman Larisa Reyderman has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Ziad Hussein No disclosure on file