Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Incidence of Leukopenia in Ketogenic diet: A single-center experience
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG)
P13 - Poster Session 13 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
12-001
 This study explores the incidence of leukopenia while adhering to one of the ketogenic diet therapies. 
Ketogenic diet therapies have been shown to be an effective treatment for epilepsy in children and adults. Current consensus guidelines recommend that lab work be completed prior to diet initiation, and then every three months during the first year on diet; this includes a CBC with platelets. 

A retrospective study was conducted on pediatric charts (age <22 years at time of initiation) from 2010-2019. N=129 charts were screened for having been seen by a Registered Dietitian in the epilepsy clinic. After initial screen, further charts were excluded as there was unclear documentation that they ever started dietary therapy (N=50). Individuals from this center were on ketogenic diet, Modified Atkins diet, or low glycemic index diet, with varying levels of compliance. In total, 79 charts were reviewed for CBC results and additional lab trends.

Out of 79 pediatric patients who started on one of the ketogenic diet therapies, 12 patients were found to be leukopenic after diet initiation. 11 of 12 patients had a pre-diet CBC available for comparison. All patients with available pre-diet bloodwork were noted to have a decrease in leukocytes after diet initiation. None of the patients who developed leukopenia required extra precautions/changes in management. All 6 out of 12 patients who have been since weaned off diet have had improvement/normalization of labs.


 

Routine labwork remains a key component of ketogenic diet monitoring. The population studied showed that 15% of patients demonstrated leukopenia as a direct result of the ketogenic diet.Development of leukopenia after diet initiation may lead to further testing/medical follow-up that does not necessarily warrant medical intervention. Further review of current practice guidelines is needed to determine the cost/benefit analysis of specific laboratory panels if no intervention is performed.


Authors/Disclosures

PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
Eric Segal, MD Dr. Segal has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lundbeck. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Eisai. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Neurelis. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Zogenix. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Aquestive. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Greenwich Biosciences. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Aquestive. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Neurelis. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Greenwhich Bioscience. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Greenwhich Bioscience. Dr. Segal has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Neurelis.
Juliann M. Paolicchi, MD No disclosure on file
Enrique A. Feoli, MD (North East Regional Epilepsy) Dr. Feoli has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file