Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Visual Field Defect Rehabilitation through Visual Restoration Therapy
Neuro-rehabilitation
P18 - Poster Session 18 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
7-002
Analyse the efficiency of Visual Restoration therapy as a tool in the management of visual field defects.
Visual field deficits have a poor response to medications and complete spontaneous recovery of vision is rare. In spite of recent advances in biotechnology, there currently exists no consensus on rehabilitative therapy.

A prospective follow up study.

  • Inclusion criteria:

    Participants above 18 years of age and willing to participate.

    Visual field defects resulting from lesion of visual pathway beginning at retina to the occipital cortex.

     

    Exclusion criteria:

    Ocular pathology – either a primary ocular disease or secondary to any systemic disease like Diabetes / Hypertension,etc.

  • Method:

  • Patients presenting with visual field defects are assessed with automated perimetry and optical Coherence Tomography, prior and post 3 months of therapy.

     

  • An image (face) unveils itself in a sectoral fashion by both clockwise and anticlockwise direction corresponding to the visual field defect in patient.

     

  • The video is calibrated to 3 different speeds of 30, 60 and 120 seconds with an enhancing colour contrast background of either Red, Green or Blue as the video progresses.

     

  • Patient is instructed to focus at the centre of the video as the image unveils. The visual task is to be performed 1 hour a day for 3 months.

     

  • Assessment of Visual field Index was used to measure the outcome of therapy.

A total of 25 patients with visual field defect were enrolled to the study.  

  • Totally 14 male and 11 female participants, median age being 43 years.
  •  
  • On an average, the visual field index improved by an 8%.

Our study was found to be beneficial in the management of visual field defects.

Marginal improvement demonstrated in the visual field is tantamount to a huge clinical translation, aiding in daily activity and opens up a new avenue in Visual Field rehabilitation.
Authors/Disclosures
Lakshmanan Sankaranarayanan, Sr.
PRESENTER
Mr. Sankaranarayanan has nothing to disclose.
Guhan Ramamurthy, MD, DM (BG Hospital) Dr. Ramamurthy has nothing to disclose.
Lakshmi N. Ranganathan, MD, PhD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ Dr. Ranganathan has nothing to disclose.