Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Clinical Update For Cenobamate: Patients’ Experiences of Efficacy and Side Effects
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG)
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG) Posters (7:00 AM-5:00 PM)
116
Assess efficacy, adverse effects/medication interactions of Cenobamate in epilepsy patients.

Cenobamate is the newest AED that works by modulating GABAA receptors and reducing repetitive neuronal firing by inhibiting voltage-gated Na+ channels1. A randomized double-blind trial determined 50% responder-rate for Cenobamate of 50.4% and seizure freedom rate of 28.3%2. To avoid potential side effects, 12-week titration was recommended3.

Retrospective, non-randomized review of electronic medical records. EMR was queried for patients at Rush Medical Center who have an active Cenobamate prescription between 03/01/2020 and 09/30/2020.

58 patients were identified; 4 excluded due to age (<18). Records of 54 patients (median age 33, range 18-68) were reviewed.

At the dose of 50mg, 12.5% of patients reported seizure freedom. At 100mg, 50% of patients reported seizure freedom and 25% of patients had 50% seizure reduction. At the dose of 200mg, 33% of patients were seizure free and 81% had seizure reduction of ≥50%. 

Most common side effects were drowsiness (37%), imbalance (26%), fatigue (24%), and dizziness (20%). Two patients reported a rash (4%).

For drowsiness, the most common concurrent AEDs included Clobazam (76%), Brivaracetam (47%), CBD (41%), and Lacosamide (41%). For imbalance: Clobazam (75%), CBD (50%), Brivaracetam (42%), and Lamotrigine (33%).

Majority of patients experienced improvement in adverse effects when doses of concurrent AEDs were lowered.

There seems to be a pharmacodynamic interaction of Cenobamate with certain medications, such as Brivaracetam/Levetiracetam, which implies an interaction with a mechanism involving SV2A ligand binding and/or its physiological effects.

Cenobamate has good efficacy that begins early in titration period, with dose dependent response. Adverse effects represent Cenobamate’s pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions with other AEDs. To remedy this, it may be reasonable to proactively reduce doses of concurrent AEDs, when safe from clinical standpoint. Patients should be encouraged to take a long view of this medication given its promising efficacy.
Authors/Disclosures
Julia Bodnya, MD (University of Chicago)
PRESENTER
Dr. Bodnya has nothing to disclose.
Michael C. Smith, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Rush University Medical Center) Dr. Smith has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for SK Lifesciences. Dr. Smith has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for SK Lifesciences .
Rebecca O'Dwyer, MD (Rush University Medical Center) Dr. O'Dwyer has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for UCB Pharma. Dr. O'Dwyer has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for SK Life Sciences.
No disclosure on file