Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Thrombolysis versus Thrombaspiration in Acute Ischemic Stroke:A Prospective Observational Study from a Rural Tertiary Care Center in India
Cerebrovascular Disease and Interventional Neurology
P9 - Poster Session 9 (12:00 PM-1:00 PM)
4-015

To observe how stroke outcome differs with the method of treatment.

 

The increasing stroke burden among necessitates identification of the best available treatment option. Thrombolysis  approved for treatment of acute ischemic stroke cannot always fully recanalise the vessels. Endovascular thromboaspiration using ADAPT technique requires comparison with thrombolysis and dual antiplatelet treatment(DAPT).

This prospective observational study enrolled 106 participants who underwent thrombolysis (n=47) , thromboaspiration (n=10) and DAPT (n=49) presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptoms.  Study was commenced after obtaining clearance from IEC & written informed consent among patients who fulfilled inclusion & exclusion criteria. Data was collected in case record forms and included history, physical examination, imaging findings, NIHSS (baseline, 1 hour, 24 hours and 7 days) and modified rankin scale (mRS) at 1&3 months and were analysed using R™. Normality of distribution the tests of significance were tested and processed using spss 22version.

Thromboaspiration was observed to have  lower age (p=0.003), higher proportion of smokers (p=0.04), aphasia (p=0.02),  dyslipidemia (p=0.004) and higher NIHSS (p=0.01) at baseline.Participants who underwent thrombolysis had significantly lower NIHSS at 1 hour (p<0.001), 24 hours (p=0.01) and at 7 days (p=0.005). Significantly higher reduction in NIHSS was observed with thromboaspiration (p=0.02) compared to other groups. Significantly lower mRS at 3 months was observed for all treatment groups including both rt-PA and higher reduction in mRS was observed with thrombolysis (p=0.03). Between alteplase and tenecteplase, no significant difference in reduction in NIHSS and mRS was observed. 8.8% (n=5) participants had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). 10% (n=1) and 8.5% (n=4) in participants who underwent thromboaspiration and thrombolysis respectively had sICH. 10.7% (n=3) and 5.3% (n=1) participants who received alteplase and tenecteplase had sICH.

Endovascular thromboaspiration & thrombolysis were effective than DAPT in acute ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase had the least risk of sICH compared to other treatment options.
Authors/Disclosures
Ahamed Subir Humyum Kabir (MES Medical College)
PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
Ahamed Subir Humyum Kabir (MES Medical College) No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file