Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus alemtuzumab in aggressive MS: a retrospective real-word study
Multiple Sclerosis
P7 - Poster Session 7 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
9-018

To evaluate efficacy and safety of series of aggressive relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients treated with aHSCT and alemtuzumab in a single Italian MS center and followed for 3 years.

Aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) represents almost 10% of all MS cases. Treatment of these patients is challenging and optimal strategies have yet to be defined. Alemtuzumab and autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (aHSCT) represent ideal candidates for managing aggressive MS because of their profound and immediate immune-ablative e?ects. However, experience is limited and uncertainty remains on correct patient selection.

61 patients with aggressive MS, according to the criteria of Rush et al. [CA Rush et al. Nat Rev Neurol 2015], were retrospectively collected from the MS center of Genova. 32 patients underwent treatment with alemtuzumab and 29 with aHSCT (conditioning regimen: carmustine/etoposide/ara-C/melphalan (BEAM) or cyclophosphamide). The proportion of patients with complete disease remission (no evidence of activity -NEDA-) was calculated at 3 years.

At baseline, aHSCT patients were younger than alemtuzumab patients (t=2.16; p=0.035), had higher EDSS (Mann-Whitney U=106; p<0.001) and more active MRI scans (Fisher exact test=12.63; p=0.001) with a higher number of baseline T1-gadolinium enhancing lesions (Mann-Whitney U=100; p<0.001). Proportion of patients achieving NEDA at 3 years was 70.8% and 46.1% for the aHSCT and alemtuzumab group, respectively. Relapses occurred more frequently in the alemtuzumab group (p<0,001). The interaction treatment x time in RM-ANCOVA showed a significant effect of aHSCT in promoting EDSS improvement compared with alemtuzumab (mean difference [95% CI]= 2,15 [1.24-3.05], p<0.001). Early adverse events were more frequent in the aHSCT group, while late adverse events, especially autoimmune disorders, were more frequent in the alemtuzumab group (p< 0,001).

Intense immunosuppression followed by aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in reducing relapses and MRI activity in aggressive MS and promotes disability improvement.

Authors/Disclosures
Caterina Lapucci, MD (DINOGMI, University of Genoa)
PRESENTER
Dr. Lapucci has nothing to disclose.
Giacomo Boffa (Department of Neuroscience, University of Genova) Mr. Boffa has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Elisabetta Capello, MD (Ospedale San Martino - Clinica Neurologica) No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Alice Laroni Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $100,000-$499,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Teva. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Alice Laroni has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Roche. The institution of Alice Laroni has received research support from Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi MUltipla . The institution of Alice Laroni has received research support from Ministero Salute. The institution of Alice Laroni has received research support from Ministero UNiversità.
Luca Roccatagliata, MD No disclosure on file
Antonio Uccelli, MD (Ospedale S. Martino - Genova) An immediate family member of Dr. Uccelli has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Biogen. The institution of Dr. Uccelli has received research support from Merck. The institution of Dr. Uccelli has received research support from Roche.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Matilde Inglese, MD, PhD (University of Genoa) Dr. Inglese has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for SANOFI GENZYME. Dr. Inglese has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for BIOGEN. Dr. Inglese has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for NOVARTIS. Dr. Inglese has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for MERCK-SERONO. Dr. Inglese has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for ROCHE. Dr. Inglese has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for MS Journal.