Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

A Phase II, Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Rapid Acting Insulin in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Mild Alzheimer’s Disease
Aging, Dementia, and Behavioral Neurology
P7 - Poster Session 7 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
10-005

To measure the effect of rapid acting (RA) intranasal (IN) insulin on global cognition and function in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

IN insulin is a potential treatment for neurodegenerative disease shown to reduce amyloid plaques and improve verbal memory in memory-impaired adults.  Investigations have suggested that rapid-acting (RA) insulins such as glulisine may result in superior cognitive benefits compared to regular insulin.

A single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to test the efficacy of IN glulisine versus placebo in N=35 MCI/AD subjects.   IN administration utilized the Impel NeuroPharma I109 Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD®) device.  The ADAS-Cog13, CDR global score, and FAQ were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months.  Secondary outcome measures included digit span forward/backwards, Trailmaking part A/B, COWAT, and WMS logical memory.  Depression and suicidality were assessed using GDS and C-SSRS.

No significant differences in education, ApoE4 status, and MOCA score existed between treatment groups.  Overall, the number of adverse events per person was similar between groups (2.32 vs. 2.24, p=0.824); although subjects receiving IN glulisine had higher rates of nasal irritation (25.0% vs 13.9%) and respiratory symptoms (15.9% vs 8.3%) compared to placebo.  Glucose<70 was observed in one subject receiving RA insulin, but otherwise, there were no other cases of hypoglycemia, including three NIDDM patients.  No significant difference for ADAS-Cog 13, CDR or FAQ scores were found between treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. 


 

IN glulisine was safe and well-tolerated and did not consistently impact peripheral glucose.  There were no enhancing effects of IN glulisine on cognition, function, or mood, but the ability to detect significances was limited by number of subjects successfully enrolled and study duration.  Additional investigations following a larger MCI/AD cohort over a longer duration are necessary to better evaluate RA insulin efficacy in this population.

Authors/Disclosures
Michael H. Rosenbloom, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­
PRESENTER
Dr. Rosenbloom has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Esai. Dr. Rosenbloom has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Eisai. Dr. Rosenbloom has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Lilly. Dr. Rosenbloom has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Johnson and Johnson. Dr. Rosenbloom has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Medscape.
Terry R. Barclay, PhD (HealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging) Dr. Barclay has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Maria Pyle (HealthPartners Neuroscience Center) Ms. Pyle has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Aleta Svitak, MS Aleta Svitak has nothing to disclose.
Bhavani Kashyap, MBBS, PhD (HealthPartners Neuroscience Center) Dr. Kashyap has nothing to disclose.
William H. Frey II, PhD (Alzheimer's Research Center, Regions Hospital) Dr. Frey has stock in IntrepiCyte, LLC. The institution of Dr. Frey has received research support from United States Department of Defense. Dr. Frey has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care. Dr. Frey has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.
Leah R. Hanson, PhD (Health Partners Neuroscience Center) The institution of Dr. Hanson has received research support from NIA. The institution of Dr. Hanson has received research support from Merck Foundation. The institution of Dr. Hanson has received research support from Eagle Pharmaceuticals. The institution of Dr. Hanson has received research support from Research Grow Lab. The institution of Dr. Hanson has received research support from State of Minnesota. Dr. Hanson has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.