Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Relative Importance of Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: Predicting Neurodegeneration by Apolipoprotein E-e4 Carrier Status
Aging, Dementia, and Behavioral Neurology
P5 - Poster Session 5 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
10-009
Using a machine learning approach, we determine relative importance of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers to predict neurodegeneration as stratified by Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4status.  

Recent biomarker research on neurodegenerative diseases has focused on combinations of multiple risk factors to predict development of cognitive impairment and dementia. We combine (1) global brain atrophy as measured by brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), (2) leading AD genetic risk marker (APOE), and (3) commonly examined AD biomarkers to understand the influence of risk factors in relation to differential patterns of atrophy in AD.  

We used a ~2-year longitudinal sample (followed annually) of diagnosed AD patients (baseline N=187; mean age=70.57 years; range=37-89 years) from the Sunnybrook Dementia Study. We used (1) latent growth modeling and class analyses to estimate the number of classes that best represented BPF ([(normal appearing gray matter +normal appearing white matter +white matter hyperintensities)/(total intracranial volume) x 100]) over 2 years, and (2) Random Forest Analysis to test relative predictive importance of AD biomarkers from six different domains (demographic, dementia history, IQ, depressive symptoms, clinical dementia severity, cognitive markers) on BPF in the whole sample and as stratified by APOE ?4 status. 

First, we observed a 4-class model (low, intermediate, high, and very high global atrophy) for ~2-year BPF decline (AIC=1794.310; BIC=1839.545; -2LL=1766.31; Entropy=0.818). Second, we observed differences in relative importance of AD biomarkers to discriminate patients with low atrophy versus intermediate, high, and very high atrophy and this was moderated by APOE ?4 carrier status.   
Relative importance of key biomarkers in discriminating AD patients with differential levels of global brain atrophy patterns is moderated by APOE ?4+ status. Integration of a machine learning approach across multiple risk domains may (1) identify biomarker profiles of relatively resilient groups across neurodegenerative diseases and (2) lead to personalized medicine to delay accelerated decline. 
Authors/Disclosures
Shraddha Sapkota, PhD (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre)
PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Donald Stuss No disclosure on file
Mario Masellis, MD (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre) Dr. Masellis has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Arkuda Therapeutics. Dr. Masellis has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Ionis. Dr. Masellis has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alector. Dr. Masellis has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Wave Life Sciences. The institution of Dr. Masellis has received research support from Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The institution of Dr. Masellis has received research support from Ontario Brain Institute. The institution of Dr. Masellis has received research support from Weston Brain Institute. The institution of Dr. Masellis has received research support from Washington University. The institution of Dr. Masellis has received research support from Alector. Dr. Masellis has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.
Sandra E. Black, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (Sunnybrook Health Science Center) Dr. Black has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr. Black has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Black has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr. Black has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Black has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Eisai Limited . Dr. Black has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Eli Lilly. Dr. Black has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from Hoffmann-La Roche. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from GE Healthcare. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from Eli Lilly. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from Genentech. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from NovoNordisk. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from UCB Biopharma. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from Alkahest Inc. The institution of Dr. Black has received research support from University of Southern California - AHEAD 3-45 Study.