Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Comparative effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke according to the recurrent stroke risks: An analysis of 15000 patients from a nationwide, multicenter registry
Cerebrovascular Disease and Interventional Neurology
P4 - Poster Session 4 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
4-020
To compare the effectiveness of the dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel-aspirin (DAPT) with that of aspirin monotherapy (AM) in acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke considering the risk of recurrent stroke by the SPI-II score.
Magnitudes of effectiveness of DAPT for acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke patients according to the recurrent stroke risks have not been extensively studied.
This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter registry between January 2011 and July 2018. Acute (within 24h of onset), mild-to-moderate (NIHSS score ≤10), and non-cardioembolic stroke patients were identified. The SPI-II scores were retrospectively calculated and categorized into 3 groups; low (0-3), middle (4-7), and high risk (8 or more). The primary outcome event was a composite of stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality within 3m of stroke. Propensity scores using IPTW were used to adjust baseline imbalances between the DAPT and AM groups according to the SPI-II subgroups.  

Among the 15,430 patients (age, 66±13yrs; male, 62.0%), 45.1% received a DAPT and 54.9% received an AM. The primary outcome events were significantly more frequent in the AM group (16.7%) than in the DAPT group (15.5%) (P=0.03). Weighted Cox PH analysis showed the reduced risk of 3-month vascular events in the DAPT group vs the AM group (HR 0.84 [0.78-0.92]), with no interactions with acute treatments and the SPI-II risk subgroups (Pinteraction=0.44). However, among the high risk patients of SPI-II scores >7, a substantially larger absolute benefit was observed for 3-month composite vascular events in the DAPT group.

Treatment with DAPT significantly reduced the risk of 3-month vascular events compared with AM in acute, mild-to-moderate, non-cardiogenic, ischemic stroke patients. The treatment effects of DAPT vs AM were consistent with the recurrent stroke risk subgroups by the SPI-II scores, but more substantial benefits of DAPT in the high risk subgroup.   

Authors/Disclosures
Joontae Kim, MD, PhD (Chonnam National University Hospital)
PRESENTER
Dr. KIM has nothing to disclose.
Seung-Han Lee, MD, PhD (Chonnam National University Hospital) Dr. Lee has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Hee-Joon Bae, MD (Eulji Gen Hosp/Dept of Neuro) No disclosure on file