Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Quantitative Neuroimaging of Volume Loss in Persons with Alzheimer’s Dementia
Aging, Dementia, and Behavioral Neurology
P2 - Poster Session 2 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
10-006

To characterize volumetric alterations in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s Dementia (AD) using a clinically automated quantitative volumetric MR neuroimaging.

Automated brain volumetric software programs are FDA-cleared for clinical use. However, these programs have not yet been tested in their diagnostic utility, specifically in the clinical setting of AD.

Clinically acquired volumetric MPRAGE brain MRI scans of 79 persons with a clinical diagnosis of AD (age 67.2 ± 11. years) were retrospectively reviewed and then analyzed using Neuroreader, an FDA-cleared software program. In this sample, 54% were women. The volumes of 45 brain structures were calculated and statistically adjusted for head size, age, and gender. Regional volumes were then compared to a normative database to compute Z-scores and percentiles for evaluating regionally specific atrophy.

Persons with clinically diagnosed AD demonstrated a pattern of diffuse, global atrophy with a temporal and mesial temporal predilection.  Despite exhibiting the greatest magnitude of volume loss, regions such as the hippocampus, amygdala, putamen, ventral diencephalon, left parietal lobe, and temporal lobe were in the 30th-40th percentile compared to the normative database. These values are higher than the vendor recommended cutoff of 25th percentile for determining abnormally low brain volume.

Data driven quantitative thresholds for volumetrically evaluated brain atrophy on MRI scans do not currently exist in clinical practice. In our study, atrophy in patients with clinically diagnosed AD may be detected with automated brain volumetric software programs. In this study sample, regions demonstrating atrophy were in the 30-40th percentile as compared to patients in a healthy normative database. As such, these regions would not have been considered “abnormal” in standard cut-offs at the 25th percentile. We suggest that regions in the 26th-40th percentile may therefore be atrophic and future studies with larger samples should further refine these thresholds.

Authors/Disclosures
Somayeh Meysami, MD (Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint Johns Health Center)
PRESENTER
Dr. Meysami has nothing to disclose.
Cyrus A. Raji, MD, PhD (Washington University in St Louis) Prof. Raji has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Brainreader ApS. Prof. Raji has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Apollo Health . Prof. Raji has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Neurevolution Medicine.
Mario F. Mendez, MD, PhD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and UCLA) Dr. Mendez has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Medical Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ Speakers' Bureau. Dr. Mendez has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for UpToDate. The institution of Dr. Mendez has received research support from NIH. Dr. Mendez has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.