Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Disability assessment in the Google Maps era: a feasibility study to explore a new clinical opportunity
Multiple Sclerosis
P15 - Poster Session 15 (12:00 PM-1:00 PM)
9-005

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a large-scale trial to test the effectiveness of Google Maps application in order to improve the evaluation of Ambulation Score (AS) and the related EDSS in clinical practice. 

AS is the most used scale to assesses gait impairment in people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). AS relies mostly on the maximum distance a patient can walk without rest (maximum walking distance, MWD). In clinical practice doctors traditionally rely on patients’ estimates concerning the walked distance. Several studies showed the inaccuracy of such distance estimates and therefore the unreliability of disability assessment in clinical practice.

243 pwMS were recruited in five Italian MS Centers.

We collected 1. demographical and clinical data ; 2. the AS based on pwMS referred MWD (perceived AS, pAS) and, consequently, the perceived EDSS (pEDSS); 3) the AS based on MWD identified on Google Maps (gmAS) and, consequently, the google maps EDSS (gmEDSS). We evaluated  the agreement between the two latter measurements and whether demographic and clinical data might have influenced the agreement. Finally, in a subgroup of 75 pwMS we evaluated an actual AS (actAS), objectively measured, and we tested the agreement among the pAS, the gmAS and the actAS.

pEDSS and gmEDSS were coincident in 169/243 (69.55%) pwMS. In 74/243 (30,45%) were different (higher/lower).These two groups were significantly different for FSS (p= 0.01) and PHQ-9 (p = 0.002) and frequency of progressive phenotype (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.1 – 7.11, p = 0.03). The pEDSS and the actEDSSwere coincident in 45.3% of pwMS. gmEDSS and the actEDSS were coincident in 57.3%

In conclusion, we suggest that Google Maps application could be easily applied in a real-life clinical setting to calculate the AS and that is suitable to be evaluated  in future clinical studies.

Authors/Disclosures
Gianmarco Abbadessa, MD (University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli)
PRESENTER
Dr. Abbadessa has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck.
Luigi Lavorgna Luigi Lavorgna has nothing to disclose.
Pietro Iaffaldano No disclosure on file
Roberta Lanzillo Roberta Lanzillo has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck, Biogen. Roberta Lanzillo has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen, Roche, Novartis.
Sabrina Esposito No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Giacomo Lus (Policlinico di Napoli) Giacomo Lus has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Marinella Clerico, MD (University of Torino) Dr. Clerico has nothing to disclose.
Paolo Ragonese No disclosure on file
Giovanna Borriello Giovanna Borriello has nothing to disclose.
Elisabetta Signoriello Elisabetta Signoriello has nothing to disclose.
Maria Trojano (Policlinico - Bari) Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi_Genzyme. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Janssen. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sandoz. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Roche. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sanofi-Genzyme. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Maria Trojano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Janssen.
Gioacchino Tedeschi, MD (University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli") Dr. Tedeschi has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Tedeschi has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Lilly. Dr. Tedeschi has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis.
Simona Bonavita No disclosure on file