Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapy: Recent Switch Patterns Among United States Neurologists
Multiple Sclerosis
P14 - Poster Session 14 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
9-018
To examine multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy (DMT) switch patterns by US Neurologists over the last 5 years.
Cross-sectional patient-level data was collected once-yearly. It was then reviewed by an independent market intelligence agency which specializes in tracking the MS market, including trending changes in management and treatment patterns. 

DMT switches were evaluated on an annual basis over a 4 year period, from late 2015 to early 2019. Data was based on N=1,002 to N=1,035 MS patient chart reviews contributed online by Neurologists (N=194 to N=260). 2020 data will be included at presentation.

77% of recent DMT switches involve a first switch (up from 69% in 2015), 17% involve a second switch, and only 6% involve a third or higher switch. Overall, the most common 2019 switches have been from injectables, glatiramer acetate (GA; 38%) and interferon betas (IFNβs; 30%). Patients frequently switched to an oral DMT (35%) or a monoclonal antibody (mAb; 30%); few switched to an injectable (36%), either IFNβ (12%) or GA (24%). Over the past 4 years, switching from an IFNβ to an oral DMT is decreasing (22% in 2015 vs. 13% in 2019), while switching from GA to a mAb (5% vs. 10%), or from an oral DMT to a mAb (3% vs. 11%), is increasing. Over the same period, the most common first switch was consistently from an injectable to an oral DMT (35% vs. 32%); GA agents were a slightly larger source of first switches (41%) than IFNβ (35%) in 2019. The most common second switch in 2019 was from an oral DMT to a mAb (22%), or from GA to a mAb (13%).

MS DMT switch patterns are changing. There are fewer second or later switches perhaps related to earlier use of a higher efficacy DMT as a switch agent.

Authors/Disclosures
Patricia K. Coyle, MD, FÂé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­ (SUNY At Stony Brook)
PRESENTER
Dr. Coyle has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Accordant. Dr. Coyle has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen. Dr. Coyle has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi Genzyme. Dr. Coyle has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Coyle has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Coyle has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Horizon Therapeutics. The institution of Dr. Coyle has received research support from CorEvitas LLC. The institution of Dr. Coyle has received research support from Genentech/Roche. The institution of Dr. Coyle has received research support from NINDS. The institution of Dr. Coyle has received research support from Sanofi Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Coyle has received research support from Cleveland Clinic.
Jennifer Robinson No disclosure on file
Jennifer Robinson No disclosure on file