ALSFRS-R R-sum correlated with %FVC moderately (r =0.47; p<0.001) but weaker between individual items and %FVC. Sensitivity was 60.9% and specificity was 71.5% for the ALSFRS-R R-sum when we set %FVC 80% as a cut-off value, below which implied respiratory restriction. Sensitivity was 69.8% and specificity was 75.9% for the ALSFRS-R R-sum when we set %FVC 50% as a cut-off value, below which implied non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is recommended. Decline of %FVC separated sub-groups with different respiratory function progression rate more obviously and more sensitively than that of ALSFRS-R R-sum. Older age, shorter diagnostic delay, shorter time from diagnosis to first follow-up, fewer follow-up times, lower baseline FVC were significantly associated with faster decline of respiratory function.