Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate According to Epilepsy Etiology: A Post-hoc Analysis of Three Phase III Trials in Adults with Focal Seizures
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG)
P13 - Poster Session 13 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
12-010

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adults with focal seizures, according to epilepsy etiology.

ESL is a once-daily (QD), oral antiepileptic drug (AED) for focal (partial-onset) seizures.

Data were pooled from three Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials
(2093-301, -302, -304). After an 8-week baseline period, adults with ≥4 focal seizures/month and taking 1–3 AEDs were randomized equally to receive placebo, ESL 400 mg (Studies 301 and 302 only; not reported here), ESL 800 mg or ESL 1200 mg QD (2-week titration; 12-week maintenance).

Epilepsy etiology categories (safety/efficacy analysis populations) included: other/unknown (n=526/520), idiopathic (n=255/239), cranial trauma/injury (n=166/164), congenital/hereditary disorders (n=109/106), and infectious disease (n=105/104). Responder (≥50% reduction from baseline in standardized seizure frequency) rates were dose-related for most etiologies. Patients with infectious disease (58.3%) and cranial trauma/injury (46.3%) etiologies had the highest responder rates with ESL 1200 mg; patients with congenital/hereditary disorders had the lowest (29.0%). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidences were generally higher with ESL than placebo but similar between ESL doses, across etiologies. Serious adverse events occurred in <10% of patients in most groups. Incidences of TEAEs leading to ESL discontinuation were dose-related. TEAEs leading to ESL discontinuation (32.4%) and psychiatric TEAEs (13.5%) were most frequent in patients with congenital/hereditary disorders receiving ESL 1200 mg.

The efficacy of ESL was generally comparable across epilepsy etiologies (responder rates: 23–58%). Responder rates were higher with ESL than placebo and dose-related. Responder rates were highest in patients with epilepsy caused by infectious disease or cranial trauma/injury, and lowest in those with congenital/hereditary disorders. Incidences of TEAEs leading to ESL discontinuation were dose-dependent. TEAEs leading to ESL discontinuation and psychiatric TEAEs occurred most frequently in patients with congenital/hereditary disorders.

Authors/Disclosures
David Cantu, PhD (Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc)
PRESENTER
Dr. Cantu has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc..
Todd Grinnell, PhD Todd Grinnell, PhD has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc..
Luis Magalhaes (Bial-Portela & C S.A.) Luis Magalhaes has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A..
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file