Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Âé¶¹´«Ã½Ó³»­

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Acceptance of Telemedicine within an Academic Neurology Department
Practice, Policy, and Ethics
P10 - Poster Session 10 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
7-008
The objective of this study is to evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of teleneurology at an academic neurology department. 

Teleneurology has shown promise in increasing access to neurologic care, though successful adoption relies on acceptance by patients and their providers. Studies have shown that telemedicine is well received by patients. However, little is known about provider perceptions about telemedicine. Understanding provider attitudes may help with identifying barriers to its adoption into clinical practice and inform strategies to improve acceptance by providers.

A Web-based, self-administered, anonymous, cross-sectional survey was sent to staff neurologists, neuropsychologists and trainees within the department. Descriptive statistics were used to examine characteristics of participants and their perceptions. Chi-squared tests were performed to evaluate for differences in the distribution of responses between groups. 

73 of 93 (78%) potential subjects completed the survey. The average age was 37.8 years and average number of post-training clinical experience was 5.8 years. 50% of participants were staff neurologists/neuropsychologists and 45% were either residents or fellows. 87% of participants had had some exposure to telemedicine and 42% had participated in a telemedicine encounter. 70% of participants agreed that telemedicine offered more advantages than disadvantages, though there was a difference between those who had had exposure to telemedicine (83%) than those without such  exposure (62%) (p=0.05). The most commonly cited concerns were lack of time for telemedicine, lack of technical expertise or support, concerns about compensation and inability to adequately assess patients during encounters. 

Overall, providers felt that telemedicine would improve neurologic care. Challenges such as technological support and expertise, reimbursement and medicolegal concerns must be addressed for physicians to feel more comfortable using telemedicine. Further research is warranted to determine the levels and needs for training of physicians on various telemedicine technologies.
Authors/Disclosures
Meena R. Kannan, MD
PRESENTER
Dr. Kannan has nothing to disclose.
Nina J. Solenski, MD (UVA - Neurology) Dr. Solenski has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as an Expert Witness for Multiple. The institution of Dr. Solenski has received research support from HRSA . Dr. Solenski has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.